Becerra v. Dr. Pepper Brian and Shant discuss the use of the word “diet” and whether it misled consumers to believe that diet soda would likely promote weight loss.  Multiple dictionaries were used to understand what the word “diet’ is meant to convey, but the determination is based on the

People v. Royal Brian and Shant discuss the past recollection recorded exception to the hearsay rule and the elements that trigger the exception.  They court examined the time element and determined that too much time had expired from the event itself to the time the recollection was recorded. McDermott Ranch

Brian and Shant sit down with appellate attorney Harry Chamberlain to discuss the origins of the of the Anti-SLAPP statute, protecting the free speech of lawyers, and tips for preserving a good record for appeal.  Harry is certified as an Appellate Specialist by the California State Bar Board of Legal

Halyard Health v. Kimberly Clark 2nd DCA Brian and Shant discuss a declaratory relief action in a matter that arises out of Michael Avenatti’s Kimberly Clark Case.  The issue is whether Delaware or California law dictates which defendant is responsible for a punitive damages award granted to the plaintiffs. Safechuck v.

Brian and Shant speak with renowned defense attorneys Dana Fox and Eddie Ward. They discuss the defense perspective on trials, civility, and moving cases along during the COVID-19 crisis. Dana Fox and Eddie Ward are partners at Lewis Brisbois. Dana Fox has a reputation as the “go-to” attorney in high

Brian and Shant discuss business interruption insurance with Michael Childress, Of Counsel at Kabateck LLP. With all the closures, businesses large and small are taking the inordinate hit for the rest of society to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 virus.  We primarily look at property insurance policies.  This is

Union Pacific Railroad v. Ameron Pole Property Brian and Shant discuss an inquiry into the causation element of an accident involving a light pole.  The plaintiff’s case first thrown out on summary judgment was later reversed because the remaining parties’ indemnity suit and the plaintiff’s complaint were inextricably connected. Gordon

Cacho v. Eurostar Defendant had facially non-compliant meal & rest break policies.  The court concluded that the class cannot be certified because Plaintiff did not sufficiently illustrate a uniform policy of missed meal breaks.  Individual questions predominated as to whether the plaintiff missed rest and meal breaks. In Re Williams

From his first trial representing a family in a bad faith case resulting in a successful verdict to his recent whistleblower cases returning money to the federal government, Niall is passionate about his advocacy for the under-represented.  Niall has spent his entire 28-year career with his current firm where is the managing partner.  He

The son of immigrant parents and the eldest of eight children, Minh is no stranger to hardship. Minh worked three jobs through college to fund his family’s mortgage and made his way to Hastings College of Law in San Francisco. Minh’s passion for advocacy comes through in his personal injury