Brian and Shant discuss various types of litigation funding available to lawyers and law firms, and the potential pitfalls of the borrowing money to fund

Brian and Shant discuss the following cases: Loeb v. County of San Diego: Plaintiff was in a county park campground and was injured on an uneven

Brian and Shant discuss the following cases: Hood v. Gonzalez: A nightmare client who had gone through five lawyers.  The client signed the settlement agreement but

Steve discusses his journey and determination to make it through law school and find success in his practice. Steve goes into great detail about one

Brian and Shant discuss the following cases: Johnson v. MGM: Plaintiff argues that the District Court did not do an appropriate calculation to determine attorney fees

An esteemed trial attorney in the state, Bill’s practice focuses on personal injury and product liability.  Bill recollects one of his more memorable first trials

Casey is a second-generation Southern Californian and the first in his family to graduate from college.  A graduate of USC Gould School of Law and

Brian and Shant discuss the following cases: Brown v. Upside Gating: Defendants file an appeal to a judicial order arguing that it was tantamount to an

Mary Alexander – Mary’s practice is comprised of product liability, toxic tort, auto accidents, pharmaceutical cases, and class actions.  With an undergraduate focus in science

Brian and Shant discuss the following cases: Monster Energy Company v. City Beverages LLC: When must the arbitrator disclose information regarding their financial interest in the