48. Personal Injury Cases
Thimon v City of Newark (1st DCA) Road Design and the Standard for Summary Judgement Alaniz v Sun Pac Shippers (2nd DCA) The Privette and Hooker Doctrines
Join us as hosts Brian Kabateck and Shant Karnikian analyze legal issues and developments in California law affecting plaintiff lawyers and their practices.
Kabateck LLP presents Civil Action with California trial lawyers Brian and Shant. The show presents a summary of recent appellate decisions affecting all area of plaintiff-side civil litigation, from personal injury to employment, from landmark cases to changes in procedure. This weekly series keeps you informed on a variety of hot legal topics from throughout the state. This is Civil Action.
Thimon v City of Newark (1st DCA) Road Design and the Standard for Summary Judgement Alaniz v Sun Pac Shippers (2nd DCA) The Privette and Hooker Doctrines
Hance v Super Store Industries (5th DCA) Enforceability of a Fee Share Agreement Fenimore v The Regents of the University of CA (2nd DCA) Computation of the
Zehia v Sup Court of San Diego County (4th DCA) Personal Jurisdiction in an Electronic Defamation Action Torres v Design Group Facility Solutions (2nd DCA) Renewed Motion
Schaeffer v Califia Farms LLC (2nd DCA) What Constitutes A False Statement in a False Advertising Case Rincon EV Realty LLC v CP III Rincon
Brian and Shant have an in-depth discussion with attorney and arbitrator Lee Straus about a case reviewed on a prior Civil Action podcast. Mr. Straus
Brian sits down with ethics attorney Ellen Pansky, remotely, to discuss COVID-19 and its impact on virtual court and other legal proceedings and her work
Brian and Michael Childress sit down with Philip Camino of Camino Industries. Philip owns and operates Fellow (www.fellow.la) among other hospitality venues in Los Angeles
Brian and guest host, Serena Vartazarian speak with Loyola law student and Kabateck LLP law clerk, Gary Partamian about COVID-19, its effect on his final
Wilson v. Huuuge Inc. Brian and Shant discuss a class action based on a browsewrap arbitration agreement’s requirements. Seemingly hidden, the consumer would have had
Becerra v. Dr. Pepper Brian and Shant discuss the use of the word “diet” and whether it misled consumers to believe that diet soda would